oscardoms wrote (2022-08-12 14:36:39):

Having seen a nymph's ribcage forming those delicate contours on her white, slim torso -- oh my goodness. -- I can never forget her!!<br>A photo set in a million, a favourite for ever.<br>Thank you, ... nude beauty, and compliments to the photographer!

xxxukguyxxx wrote (2018-09-22 02:43:42):

Gloria? If so, will always be ridiculously hot.

anonymous wrote (2013-04-30 16:54:37):

Table pussy, to eat

majikmaestro wrote (2012-05-03 14:58:33):

well, I think she is sweet, and gorgeous ...

anonymous wrote (2012-02-16 23:18:04):

Much as I like your site and choice of models, I must agree with the comments this gentleman has made. Low res is too small, Med res is too small, and High res is not large enough! For example, take a look at MET and MET Mods, their med res is a very good size, and the Hi res option is huge and way bigger than your hi res. Thanks for your attention.

Genelec wrote (2012-01-06 18:15:06):

Hello. My comment is not on this set but on your terms. This is the first time I have been to your site. I need to complain about your choice of picture resolution. Medium-size is so small, it is ridiculous. 1024*682 pixels... who even makes monitors this small? You should call it "optimized for smartphones" - I dont even want to know how small "Low Resolution" is. Now I download the highest resolution, and this is 700MB per set! If I download 100 sets, this takes up 70GB on my harddrive, not mentioning the traffic to your server and my time waiting for each download to finish - way too much.
My suggestion to make things better: make a "medium resolution" that has 6 megapixels, this way we will all save time and money. Your Medium Resolution is around .7 Megapixels, and that's not much use to anyone.

With best regards,
Kai Babick