anonymous wrote (2016-12-29 12:02:39):

Some bad photography. He needs to improve on subject composition.

anonymous wrote (2016-11-30 14:06:44):

Beautiful girl, poorly posed and photographed.  This lady deserves another chance with a more accomplished artist.

woofl54 wrote (2016-11-14 23:39:24):

This is one of several sets I've seen by Melwin. Drop-dead GORGEOUS women! With today's high resolution photographic equipment and monitors, it's easy to capture the smallest details of a woman's body, including her skin. Melwin has failed to deliver. I doubt I'm the only one who enjoys the fine detail of great photography, even the fine peachfuzz and texture of her skin. These sets of various models from Melwin have been so heavily touched up to the point of destroying the image, in my opinion. Blurry, washed-out and splotchy touch-ups are a major turn-off and a total waste of an opportunity to capture the raw beauty of these models. Too bad re can't see the unspoiled originals!

anonymous wrote (2016-08-18 12:58:05):

I salut this photographer for a la Victoria Secret type approach. My fantasy is to see vs models in nude situations. I love the classic lingerie(like to see pure white lingerie so as well)
She's got a perfect body I dream of and with little more breasts, it would be a 10, however, 9.8 in my book. I did not care for page 3 and 7. Too much tease and don't know where he wants to get out of this. Want to see her full figure. Her lilac crest emphasized shots is great and like to see more from the side as well. Great job! Keep it coming!

12qwerty wrote (2016-08-18 06:17:35):

What's with all that 'star' nonsense ruining a good set