hobknob wrote (2009-12-23 04:59:20):
The erotic photography critic that posted below was wrong. We can see things well enough. It's the artsy light and shadow that detract from her beauty.
sirhallen wrote (2008-12-28 18:30:32):
Anastasia is so sweet and so sexy, I have no words .. such an erotic angel. We need more photo sets and a video.
anonymous wrote (2008-08-13 21:03:39):
Anastasia, from the little of her body that we wre allowed to see, through the arty flim flam, is a very fair girl, but I am sure that I speak for everyone when I say that we want at least some good shots of her breasts and genitals. After all, why would she take her knickers off if she didn't want to display the goods. Too many girls are treated like this, to puff up a photographer's artistic credentials, but they should remember that in this case they are photographing for erotic and sexual content, to show the girl at her sexual and desirable best and help her nude career, by making men want more. Not pass her over for someone better presented. Too many seem to have in mind some esoteric competition and the plaudits of their fey colleagues rather than the paying public.
Sorry Anastasia, but you are a very lovely girl, very badly served by a rubbish photographer, who ought to have stuck to weddings and boring portraits.
Hopefully Amour Angels will point you in the right direction. You deserve a really good outing.